<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new decade, a new CAP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capreform.eu/a-new-decade-a-new-cap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capreform.eu/a-new-decade-a-new-cap/</link>
	<description>Europe&#039;s common agricultural policy is broken - let&#039;s fix it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: french derek</title>
		<link>http://capreform.eu/a-new-decade-a-new-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-42431</link>
		<dc:creator>french derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capreform.eu/?p=962#comment-42431</guid>
		<description>One of the greatest problems with the current CAP is that huge amounts of money go to food &quot;transformers&quot; - ie industrials who are forced to buy EU produce with which to make their products (milk-based, sugar-based, etc). These are not farmers. Indeed they themselves may be one of the causes of &quot;industrial agriculture&quot;. What reason is there for a continued CAP support of their businesses?

I wish these NGO&#039;s luck. Whilst their proposals look eminently sensible to me (as a taxpayer and therefore CAP contributer), I must draw attention to the recent Paris meeting of 22 EU member nations&#039; agricultural ministers. The French view of their joint agreement was more or less CAP as usual.

Play the Environmental card! Let&#039;s have real fines directly onto the real polluters. EU agriculture currently uses more petro-chemical products (fertilisers, herbicides, etc) than many other industries. (Though, in France, one must not call agriculture an industry). They are polluting water-courses, destroying wild-life and impoverishing their soils.

Bon courage, mes braves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the greatest problems with the current CAP is that huge amounts of money go to food &#8220;transformers&#8221; &#8211; ie industrials who are forced to buy EU produce with which to make their products (milk-based, sugar-based, etc). These are not farmers. Indeed they themselves may be one of the causes of &#8220;industrial agriculture&#8221;. What reason is there for a continued CAP support of their businesses?</p>
<p>I wish these NGO&#8217;s luck. Whilst their proposals look eminently sensible to me (as a taxpayer and therefore CAP contributer), I must draw attention to the recent Paris meeting of 22 EU member nations&#8217; agricultural ministers. The French view of their joint agreement was more or less CAP as usual.</p>
<p>Play the Environmental card! Let&#8217;s have real fines directly onto the real polluters. EU agriculture currently uses more petro-chemical products (fertilisers, herbicides, etc) than many other industries. (Though, in France, one must not call agriculture an industry). They are polluting water-courses, destroying wild-life and impoverishing their soils.</p>
<p>Bon courage, mes braves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

