One of the innovations in rural development programming for the next multi-annual period is that there is meant to be much greater integration between EAFRD spending and spending through the other structural and investment funds. Trying to achieve this greater integration has been, and is, a fraught and time-consuming process, with implications for when member [...]
Recent blog posts written by Alan Matthews
The Commission’s proposal to use objective criteria to allocate Pillar 2 funds was rejected by the European Council; have member states been more successful?
The Agricultural Council yesterday concluded the legislative process on the 2013 CAP reform. This post discusses the factors shaping the Ciolos reform.
Developing countries are now the dynamic motor behind the growth in global agrifood trade.
New study of the impact of climate change on European agriculture shows how full adaptation can mitigate the negative effects and exploit the possible opportunities.
The relative stability in CAP spending in the 2014-2020 MFF compared to the 2007-2013 MFF suggests that different political economy factors play out in negotiating the EU budget for agriculture than at the national level.
Much lip-service is paid to safeguarding the future of the family farm in Europe, but what exactly is a family farm and why does it need help?
The intellectual case for the G-33 public stock-holding proposal for the Bali mini-package is weak and the proposal itself has the potential to lead to damaging trade distortions, not least for other developing countries.
The EU budget will transfer an even larger share of its total resources to EU farmers next year than it does currently as a result of the 2014 budget deal reached this week.
Political agreement reached on CAP transition provisions for 2014.
George Lyon MEP claims Scottish Government argument that Scottish farmers are hard done by under the CAP is not credible.
New working paper examines the stalled Doha Round negotiations in agriculture and examines the options facing the multilateral trading system.
Scottish Government tables on CAP payments by member state show differences are reducing, but remain substantial.
Budget battles between the Council and Parliament : what they might mean for farm payments in December
Does the gradual increase in producers’ and processor’s share of the final milk price in recent years mean the Milk Package was redundant?
The outstanding elements in the CAP political agreement are finally agreed.
Submission outlining my views on convergence, flexibility and coupling in the implementation of the Direct Payments regulation in Ireland
Latest OECD agricultural policy monitoring report shows 9% increase in measured support to EU farmers in 2012, due to widening gap between producer and world market prices.
The new single CMO regulation introduces a further tightening of the limits on the use of export subsidies in the future.
Uncertainty will continue over the value of 2013 SFP payment entitlements until the end of this year.
A summary of the agricultural issues being discussed as part of the Bali mini-package in the Doha Development Round.
Another failure at Bali would surely bring the stuttering Doha Round to an end, even if no WTO member wants to be the first to pronounce it dead. But what should take its place?
The importance of public intervention in the CAP has steadily diminished and the recent CAP reform political agreement does not change this.
EU member state governments have started consultation processes on how to use the flexibility given to member states in the CAP reform political agreementin June.
If EU agricultural policy were renationalised, would spending on agricultural policy be even greater than currently under the CAP?
Latest WTO review of EU trade policy shows marginal fall in average MFN applied tariffs but there are still many tariff peaks.
France runs away in the new allocation of Pillar 2 rural development funds.
How member states direct payment envelopes are affected by the European Council conclusions on the next MFF.
The next MFF contains no discretionary reduction in CAP Pillar 1 expenditure, over and above what a continuation of current rules would imply, while the discretionary reduction in Pillar 2 is 18% between 2013 and 2020.
A flurry of activity in the past two days under the Irish Presidency opens the path to approval of the new CAP regulations in September.
Presidency issues paper defines the outstanding issues and possible compromises for a political agreement in the CAP reform trilogue process.
At this stage, none of the parties are contemplating the options if there is no agreement following the June Agricultural Council next week.
While it will be difficult for the Parliament to accept, now is not the time for it to use the blunderbuss of its veto power by rejecting the MFF for an unprecedented time.
The compromise MFF agreement is a major achievement for the Irish Presidency but approval by the Council and the Parliament will be a rocky process.
With the MFF negotiations between Council and Parliament headings towards a high-noon showdown next Tuesday 18 June, this post recalls the steps in the trilogue process to this point.
Presentation by Francesco Mantino discusses what we can expect in next rural development programmes following CAP reform.
Two presentations at a conference of Italian agricultural economists in Parma last week summarise the state of CAP reform negotiations
The problem with Europe’s ageing farmers is too few exits rather than too few entrants, and the proposed top-up payment for young farmers in Pillar 1 does nothing to address this problem.
Proposal to ban open olive oil bottles in restaurants is an excessive reaction to problems of olive oil adulteration
Time is running out to conclude this CAP reform under the Irish Presidency, but a June agreement remains a possibility.
Links to a short bibliography on CAP greening
The Parliament’s refusal to begin the planned MFF trilogues with the Council makes it difficult to envisage a political agreement under the Irish Presidency.
The Council and Parliament will struggle to reconcile their differences over how much flexibility to allow to member states and farmers in deciding eligibliity for the green payment in Pillar 1.
Uncertainty over new direct payment regulations is affect the market for single payment entitlements.
New study finds evidence that moving to decoupled farm subsidies under the CAP has had a small but measurable impact on farm productivity.
Find out how your MEPs voted on the CAP reform regulations
Compare the evolution of amendments to the CAP direct payments regulation over the course of the legislative process.
For those member states that introduce it, the redistributive payment can introduce a much more significant degree of progressivity into CAP payments than what we have seen heretofore.
How will member states mainstream the European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability into their forthcoming rural development programmes?
This is a shortened version of a post which was first written for the Institute for International and European Affairs EnvironmentNexus blog From the perspective of the agricultural environment, there are three elements in the European Council conclusions on the EU’s Multi-annual Financial Framework on 7-8 February which should be noted. The first element is [...]