How net balances might influence Member State views on the size of the next CAP budget

In this post, I look at Member State net budget balances when it comes to CAP expenditure – which Member States would be net gainers or losers from an increase or decrease in the CAP budget, assuming the allocation criteria in play in 2023 were continued. The justification for this exercise is that these net balances likely feed into Member States’ views on the appropriate size of the CAP budget. Net recipients are more likely to favour an expansion in the budget, net payers the opposite. We know that the ‘juste retour’ principle is alive and well when it comes to negotiating the next Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF).

The basic data are extracted from the DG budget Excel spreadsheet on EU spending and revenue 2000-2023. The assumption is made that we are interested in marginal additions or subtractions to the CAP budget, and that these will be financed by the residual own resource, namely the Gross National Income (GNI) contribution.… Read the rest

GHG inventory recalculations and misleading climate targets

This post is a rather technical note on how we set and interpret climate targets where the underlying data series are subject to frequent revisions. In the EU’s climate architecture, the level of ambition is usually expressed in terms of reduction commitments relative to a base year. Sometimes these reduction commitments are in percentage terms but are then converted into absolute figures using data from the National Inventory Reports for a recent year or period. In other cases, the reduction commitments are already expressed in absolute terms, but the size of the required reduction has previously been determined by reference to national inventories in a base year or period. But what happens to these targets if the data used in these National Inventory Reports are later subject to recalculation?

For example, the Effort Sharing Regulation (EU) 2018/842 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2023/837 has an Annex I which sets out for each Member State the required percentage reduction in covered emissions in 2030 relative to their 2005 levels.… Read the rest

The overlooked role of exchange rates in EU agricultural competitiveness

My attention was caught by a post on X (formerly Twitter) this week from Franz Sinabell, economist at the Austrian Institute for Economic Research. He reproduced a graph based on European Central Bank data showing the evolution of the nominal effective exchange rate for the euro over time. As can be seen from the post below, this shows a steady, if uneven, upward trend indicating a gradual appreciation of the euro, reaching a peak in August 2024. Franz commented that “Sectors that earn money on international markets – e.g. with agricultural goods or food – are currently not having an easy time”.

The post brought home to me how little attention exchange rate movements seem to get in discussions of EU agricultural competitiveness.… Read the rest

Future enlargement and its impact on the CAP budget

Yesterday’s vote in Moldova resulted in a razor-thin majority in favour of enshrining the goal of EU membership in the country’s constitution. It appears that significant efforts may have been made by outside interests to influence the voting but, even taking this into account, Moldova appears to be a country deeply divided about the future direction it wants to take. Here, the prospects for EU membership and the cost of the steps that need to be taken for membership to become a reality play an important role.

Moldova applied for EU membership on 3 March 2022, the same day as Georgia and just a few days after Ukraine made its application on 28 February 2022. These membership applications were made just a few days after Russia launched its full scale invasion of Ukraine and were obviously a response to it. Moldova has benefited from trade preferences with the EU under Autonomous Trade Measures since 2008 and signed a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement which entered provisionally into force in September 2014.… Read the rest

What can we learn from the dismantling of GAEC 8?

Annex III of the CAP Strategic Plans Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 sets out the conditionality rules that farmers seeking CAP payments should follow. Under the climate and environment heading, and with the intention to protect the quantity and quality of biodiversity, GAEC standard 8 required a minimum share of the agricultural area devoted to non-productive areas and features, with a derogation for holdings where more than 75% of the area is used for permanent grassland or for the production of grasses or other herbaceous forage, or for the cultivation of crops under water. Holdings with an arable area less than 10 hectares were also exempt, as were certain holdings in areas of natural constraints in Member States with more than 50% of their total land surface area covered by forests.

Specifically, this obligation could be fulfilled in several ways:

  • Minimum share of at least 4% of arable land at farm level devoted to non-productive areas and features, including land lying fallow.
Read the rest

Good prospects for 2024 farm incomes

The European Commission has just released its Autumn 2024 short-term Outlook for agricultural markets which highlights a gradual but fragile return to stability. Eurostat has also released data on agricultural output and input price movements for the first two quarters of this year. The Commission’s short-term Outlook does not contain a forecast for farm income developments in 2024 – we must wait until mid-December for the first official forecast when Eurostat publishes its preliminary estimate for 2024 farm income. However, with these two sources of information in hand, we can begin to make some educated guesses about the likely farm income outcome this year.

We need to have due regard to all the sources of uncertainty highlighted in the short-term Outlook. These include the potential for further extreme weather events to impact on production, the potential impact on both input costs and markets of geopolitical developments such as the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and trade disputes with China, and possible plant and animal disease outbreaks.… Read the rest

What does the outcome of the European Parliament elections mean for EU agrifood policy?

The confirmation of Ursula von der Leyen’s nomination as Commission President by the European Parliament today may give the appearance of business as usual in the European Union for the coming political cycle 2024-2029. But this would underestimate the pressures for change under the apparent veneer of stability. The political priorities set out by von der Leyen as she sought support for her nomination on this occasion are subtly different to the Green Deal platform on which she sought support in 2019. This also applies in the area of agrifood policy, an area which has been marked by protests and policy reversals in the last year of her previous mandate.

Changing priorities are a response to changes in context and circumstance. These include the wake-up call due to Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine which highlighted inter alia an unhealthy dependence on Russia for energy supplies, geo-political tensions including the need to address China’s growing role in frontier technologies, conflicts in the Middle East and Africa which contribute to migration pressures, as well as the increasingly obvious need to adapt to climate change while also pursuing ambitious mitigation goals,  

Changing priorities also reflect changed political circumstances arising from the June 2024 election to the European Parliament.… Read the rest

More on farm-retail price spreads during food price inflation

My previous blog post dealt with trends in the farm-retail price spread at the aggregate food basket level in EU Member States (both for food purchases for at home consumption and for food consumption away from home) based on a new FAOSTAT data series on the food value chain. A key conclusion was that farmers’ share of consumer spending on food tends to fall over time because of the increased quantity and quality of the marketing services added to farm raw materials as living standards rise. A falling farm share in every euro spent on food at retail or food service level is not necessarily an indicator that there is unequal bargaining power and thus an unfair distribution of value added along the food value chain, although neither does it rule out that possibility. I suggested that the soon-to-be-established Agri-food Chain Observatory intended to make developments in margins along the food value chain more transparent would do well to build on this initiative.… Read the rest

Distribution services take more than half of spending on food at home in EU countries

Anger over the gap between farm and retail food prices has been one of the factors behind the farm protests earlier this year. Particularly when  prices at farm level move in the opposite direction to retail prices – more specifically, when retail food prices increase even when farm prices are falling so that margins are increasing – there is suspicion that more powerful players in the food chain are exploiting a period of price volatility for their own benefit. There is a strong belief among stakeholders that farmers’ remuneration can be improved if changes are made to the operation of the food value chain (all of the downstream actors up to and including consumers).

In March 2024, the Commission circulated a non-paper with proposals to address this issue. The Commission proposed a portfolio of immediate, short-term and longer-term measures. The measure of particular interest for this post is the proposal to create an Observatory of costs, margins and trading practices in the agri-food chain.… Read the rest

Greater transparency needed in national aids to agriculture

On 2 May 2024, the European Commission adopted an amendment to the State aid Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework (TCTF) to allow Member States to continue to provide aid to farmers affected by persistent market disturbances up to €250,000 to end-December 2024. This followed the European Council’s endorsement in its conclusions following its meeting 17-18 April 2024 of “the proposed extension of the temporary framework on State aid and the possibility to increase the ceiling on de minimis aid for agriculture.”

Following on the European Council’s conclusions, Germany on behalf of 16 Member States informed the last AGRIFISH Council meeting in April 2024 that it was seeking an increase in the de minimis aid amounts for farmers from a total of €20,000 over three years (€25,000 in certain circumstances) to an amount of €50,000. This would become the relevant ceiling once the TCTF derogation expires at the end of the year.… Read the rest