Sugar did not experience the massive price spike in 2007-08 of other commodities, but has been making up for this with a tremendous increase in prices in 2009, driven by poor harvests in Brazil (the world’s largest producer) and strong import demand in India (the world’s largest importer). Raw sugar prices have risen from around 10 USc/lb in May 2008 to over 27 USc/lb currently, and market analysts expect further increases in the coming months.
The increase in world prices means that world prices are now above the (much reduced after the recent sugar reform) EU reference price. Recent price trends are shown in the following figure, reproduced from the SugarTraders website
Despite the very tight global market, EU sugar beet supplies have moved in the opposite direction. The EU expects a bumper sugar beet harvest this year, with beet yields among the best in years. Combined with imports from developing countries which now have free access to the EU market, the EU will have a considerable surplus over its domestic needs. However, exports are limited by a WTO ruling to 1.374 million tonnes, so the EU will be building carry-over stocks at a time of a significant global sugar deficit.
Beet growers in the EU, according to a post on the Agrimoney.com website, have called on the Commission to allow more of the EU’s sugar surplus on to the world market, but the Commission has rejected this call, saying it has to stand by the WTO ceiling. According to a Bloomberg report on 14 December last, the Commission view is that “the carry-over of surplus sugar in the EU is inevitable as it is not possible to export out-of-quota sugar in excess of the WTO limit.”
Whether this is the case or not goes back to the basis for the WTO ruling on the complaint brought by Brazil, Australia and Thailand against the previous EU sugar policy. The WTO ruled that, despite the absence of explicit export refunds for over-quota EU sugar, over-quota sugar was effectively subsidised because it was being sold at less than average cost of production and was cross-subsidised by the higher price of quota sugar.
The Bloomberg report quotes a number of UK agricultural economists who argue that because world prices are now above EU reference prices, then exports can be undertaken without subsidy and the export limits should not apply. The French Miniser for Agriculture has promised his country’s beet growers that he will raise with the Commission ways to avoid carrying over this year’s surplus into the following year.
However, the EU spokesman points out that EU market prices are still above the world price (as is also seen in the diagram above, although EU prices are only published with a 3-month lag). Thus, even without an explicit export subsidy, other exporting countries may still be able to argue that additional EU exports are only possible because of cross-subsidisation.
EU market prices have been falling, and this has consequences for those ACP developing country exporters which still benefit from a price guarantee on the EU market. Whereas ACP exporters were getting €512/tonne and €616/tonne for ACP raw and white sugars respectively in May 2007, these prices had fallen to €448/tonne and €517/tonne by September 2009 (EU sugar prices including ACP prices are reported on the EU Circa website). Some ACP exporters are now arguing that it does not pay in the short-term to export to Europe, so projected imports in the current year may be lower than expected.
Latest posts by Alan Matthews
- Gainers and losers from the CAP budget - November 17th, 2015
- Will there be a CAP reform in 2017? - November 15th, 2015
- The CAP and biodiversity - November 3rd, 2015
- The intervention logic of the CAP - November 2nd, 2015
- EU’s declining importance in agrifood trade - October 13th, 2015
- What biodiversity benefits can we expect from EFAs? - October 11th, 2015
- Does farm size matter? - October 9th, 2015
- Informal Agricultural Council to discuss climate-smart agriculture - September 13th, 2015